1 year plan: Utah Jazz

This article begins a series that will analyse what each NBA team should do in the 2016 offseason. As far as I can see, the NBA is a league where you’re either gunning for a championship or tanking – anywhere in-between is no-man’s land. With this in mind, read on:

The Utah Jazz finished with a 40-42 record last season.

This is ok.

They have a young roster with key pieces in Gordon Hayward, whose contract was extended for 4 years and $63 million before last season. He’s a ball handling forward/guard, who averaged nearly 20 points per game, five rebounds and nearly four assists in the 2016-2017 season.

They have Rudy Gobert, the French center with a standing reach almost at the rim, who averaged 2.2 blocks per game last season, nine points on 56%, most likely without leaving his tippy toes.

gobert
7’2″ center Rudy gobert shows off his apparent 9’9″ standing reach. Photo: draftexpress.com

They have Derrick Favors, a power forward who has developed into a strong defender with solid touch on the offensive end after coming into the league as raw as a stick of celery in 2010.

Furthermore, they have a bunch of other young players in the mix: including guard Dante Exum, who missed the entire season with an ACL tear; Alec Burks, who was re-signed for 4 years and $42 million, an athletic combo guard; and Rodney Hood, a versatile forward with Duke-smarts.

hood exum snyder
Hood, coach Snyder and Exum. Photo: GettyImages

The Jazz have the second youngest roster in the league, so they are still growing as a team. It’s too early to pull the plug and rebuild, as the team was only one win away from reaching the playoffs. Therefore, keeping the status quo and re-signing Rudy Gobert is the safer bet, banking on a lineup of Exum, Hood, Hayward, Favors and Gobert, with Burks as the 6th man, as the future contending team.

 

 

However, what if the Boston Celtics made an offer that the Jazz couldn’t refuse?

Utah receives: 3rd and 16th pick 2016 draft, Brooklyn Nets 2017 pick, G Marcus Smart, F/C Kelly Olynyk, SG RJ Hunter, F/C Amir Johnson

Boston receives: F/G Gordon Hayward, F/C Derrick Favors, G Alec Burks

As I outline in this article, Boston would take this deal with open arms, as they get the pieces to contend for a ring, and a Coach Stevens favourite in Hayward.

The Jazz, meanwhile, would be tanking so hard that they’d get a high pick in the stacked 2017 draft, while they’d also get the number 3 and 16 pick of this year’s draft. Furthermore, they’d receive Brooklyn’s likely lottery pick, which Boston acquired in the Garnett and Pierce trade.

Furthermore, $38 million is freed up in salaries annually, meaning they can more easily re-sign Rudy Gobert for the $15-20 million a year he deserves as an elite rim protector – a crucial cog on a championship team (see Chandler, Tyson; Bogut, Andrew).

They’d get Marcus Smart, who is already a borderline lockdown defender away from the rim, as a 6’4″, 220 pound linebacker-bodied 22 year old, who draws calls with the best of them as a notorious flopper. He shot terribly last season, averaging 35% overall, but on this Jazz team all he’d have to do on the offensive end is shoot spot up jumpers, slash and post up undoubtedly smaller point guards.

Smart would play alongside the ball handler Exum, who has point guard abilities in a 6’6″ frame. At pick #5 in the 2014 draft, he is has potentially Penny Hardaway-esque upside. He’s coming off a full year of recovering from his knee injury, having taken a chance to observe the game from courtside, and hopefully practicing his jumper. With atleast 30 minutes a game, a number he wouldn’t have reached with Hayward and Burks there, he could average 15 points, 5 rebounds and 6 or 7 assists.

The #3 pick, as I discuss in my mock draft published shortly, would go to Dragan Bender. No-one else in the draft has his upside –  he runs and shoots like a guard and blocks shots like Gobert. He could be Andrei Kirilenko 2.0, albeit taller, at 7’1″. He’s skinny, at 220 pounds, so he’d likely see minutes playing at the 3 early on, but he could become an elite stretch four as he gets stronger…he’s only 18!

Kelly Olynyk could start at the 4 spot, where he can utilise his shooting and post abilities, without having to defend too hard with Gobert behind him. He could be the go-to option on offense, as he averaged around 18 points, seven rebounds and three assists on 40% from three per 36 minutes last season for the Celtics, who only gave him 20 minutes in a frontcourt logjam.

smart olynyk.png
#36 Marcus Smart, and Kelly Olynyk behind him, hustle for the ball. Photo: celticslife.com

Amir Johnson is a throw-in to the trade, to make the salary swap fairer. His is an expiring contract anyway, and he’d provide rim protection and leadership on a team whose starters’ average age would be around 23!. Guard RJ Hunter would provide shooting and playmaking off the bench.

The team would be further bolstered with young talent by drafting Timothe Luwawu with the 12th pick, an uber athletic 6’7″ swingman from France, who at age 21 has been playing against men for over three years and would defend and shoot threes from day one. The Jazz would also have a the 42nd pick, which could be a draft and stash option, as the roster is pretty well filled already.

So, with around $50 million in cap space, the 2015-2016 Utah Jazz depth chart would look like this:

PG: M.Smart, T.Burke, R.Neto

SG: D.Exum, T.Luwawu, R.Hunter

SF: R.Hood, D.Bender, J.Ingles

PF: K.Olynyk, A.Johnson, T.Lyles

C:  R.Gobert, J.Withey, T.Pleiss

I have the team winning no more than 20 games, making it the last-placed team overall in 2016-2017, but their room for growth is insane. They have depth at every position, and every player bar the centers can play mutliple positions, meaning that young and promising coach Quin Snyder (who suddenly fits perfectly with this roster) can create matchup problems for the opposition.

If guys like Exum and Bender reach their potential, this team could reach the playoffs within 2-3 years, and contend for a championship in 5. Without the blockbluster Hayward trade, the Jazz would continue to struggle for a playoff spot, and get average talent in the draft. Since they’re a small market team and are unlikely to attract premium free agent talent, there’s only one wise option – becoming TANK CITYYYYYY!!

However, it’s still too early to blow the team up, so in my analysis of other teams I’m going to assume the Jazz keep their current core. But just think of the possibilities…Bender flying around blocking and dunking everything…Marcus SMart out-hustling everyone…Kelly Olynyk’s hair..

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s